*Five Years Citation in Google scholar (2016 - 2020) is. 1451*   *    IJPR IS INDEXED IN ELSEVIER EMBASE & EBSCO *       

logo

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

A Step Towards Excellence
Published by : Advanced Scientific Research
ISSN
0975-2366
Current Issue
No Data found.
Article In Press
No Data found.
ADOBE READER

(Require Adobe Acrobat Reader to open, If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Index Page 1
Click here to Download
IJPR 9[3] July - September 2017 Special Issue

July - September 9[3] 2017

Click to download
 

Article Detail

Label
Label
A study of patient awareness regarding the purchase of generic and ethical branded medicines

Author: SANDEEP SINGH, ANURAG TEWARI, PRANAV AGGARWAL, RAJIV RANJAN, AJIT BANSAL
Abstract: The idea of a conventional solution is generally acknowledged in different pieces of the world. All things considered, it has neglected to pick up notoriety in India because of elements, for example, non-accessibility and doubt on product quality. Nonetheless, the Indian government started selective nonexclusive medication stores named as Jan Aushadhi in 2012. Materials and Methods: This survey was based on a study where the team talked with all-out 100 patients devouring conventional and ethical branded medications, separately. The anticipated efficacy, cost of treatment, nature of medications was inquired. Results: In our investigation, 71 % of respondents found out about conventional medications and 64% knew the contrast among nonexclusive and ethical branded medicines. 66% concurred that nonexclusive meds are less expensive than ethical branded medications yet just 35% of them liked to purchase nonexclusive meds. The majority (64%) of the patients neither requested their physician or pharmacologist (60%) to convey nonexclusive medications. A larger part of them (66%) accepted that nonexclusive meds have lower quality than marked prescriptions. As indicated by patients, 45% reacted that specialists favored marked medications over conventional prescriptions. Right now, patients were endorsed by conventional medications. A large portion of them (65%) didn't turn into mindful of the administration controls about endorsing nonexclusive medications. Just 25% reacted that the legislature ought to advance nonexclusive drugs. Inference: The results indicate that respondents had freakish athleticism and perspective regarding nonexclusive medications. Many of them had inaccurate knowledge and that is not a positive symbol of Jan Aushadhi’s scheme being enforced and maintained in government hospitals.
Keyword: Ethical Branded Drugs, Jan Aushadhi, Nonexclusive medication, Physician, Pharmacologist.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP2.313
Download: Request For Article
 
Clients

Clients

Clients

Clients

Clients
ONLINE SUBMISSION
USER LOGIN
Username
Password
Login | Register
News & Events
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
Refund Policy
Instrucations for Subscribers
Privacy Policy

Copyrights Form

0.12
2018CiteScore
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Google Scholar

hit counters free