*Five Years Citation in Google scholar (2016 - 2020) is. 1451*   *    IJPR IS INDEXED IN ELSEVIER EMBASE & EBSCO *       

logo

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

A Step Towards Excellence
Published by : Advanced Scientific Research
ISSN
0975-2366
Current Issue
No Data found.
Article In Press
No Data found.
ADOBE READER

(Require Adobe Acrobat Reader to open, If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Index Page 1
Click here to Download
IJPR 9[3] July - September 2017 Special Issue

July - September 9[3] 2017

Click to download
 

Article Detail

Label
Label
Comparison of propofol ketamine versus propofol fentanyl as combination for total Intravenous anesthesia on short gynecological procedures

Author: DR. KRITAGYA SHUKLA, DR. SHAILA S. KAMATH
Abstract: Background: Use of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) has increased in the past two decades due to better understanding of pharmacokinetics of intravenous anesthetic drugs. TIVA can be used as an alternative to inhalational anesthesia in minor gynecological procedures. Advantages of TIVA with propofol also include reduced nausea and vomiting, reduced atmospheric pollution, and a better wake up profile. The study objective was to compare two drug regimens: propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl. Also, induction, maintenance and post-extubation parameters were evaluated. Materials & Methods: This study was a prospective randomized, single blinded study involving 72 adult patients ranging from 18 to 60 years, belonging to ASA grade 1 or 2 undergoing short gynecological procedures, were assigned into two groups. Propofol-ketamine was administered to group 1 while propofol-fentanyl was administered to group 2. All the results were analyzed statistically using student's t-test, chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Results: In group 1 rescue boluses of propofol was in the mean of 29.38 mgs and in group 2 was in the mean of 21.33mgs which was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.009. Mean emergence time in group1 was 5.94 minutes whereas in group 2 was 4.89 minutes which was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.001. The mean recovery time in group 1 was 11.25 minutes whereas in group 2 was 9.17 minutes which was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.001. Conclusions: Propofol-fentanyl combinations showed better emergence time and recovery profile.
Keyword: propofol, fentanyl, ketamine, total intravenous anesthesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP1.209
Download: Request For Article
 
Clients

Clients

Clients

Clients

Clients
ONLINE SUBMISSION
USER LOGIN
Username
Password
Login | Register
News & Events
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
Refund Policy
Instrucations for Subscribers
Privacy Policy

Copyrights Form

0.12
2018CiteScore
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Google Scholar

hit counters free