*Five Years Citation in Google scholar (2016 - 2020) is. 1451*   *    IJPR IS INDEXED IN ELSEVIER EMBASE & EBSCO *       

logo

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

A Step Towards Excellence
Published by : Advanced Scientific Research
ISSN
0975-2366
Current Issue
No Data found.
Article In Press
No Data found.
ADOBE READER

(Require Adobe Acrobat Reader to open, If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Index Page 1
Click here to Download
IJPR 9[3] July - September 2017 Special Issue

July - September 9[3] 2017

Click to download
 

Article Detail

Label
Label
The effect of intentional perforation of dental implants into the maxillary sinus in different depths (a histomorphometrical study)

Author: , EVAN NAMRUD YOUHANNA, SHEHAB AHMAD HAMAD, LUQMAN FAWZI OMAR
Abstract: Background and obejective: The sinus membrane perforation is considered as a potential risk factor for implant failure and sinus infection. The exposing of dental implant into the maxillary sinus combined with membrane perforation might increase risks of implant failure and sinus complication. Therefore, oral and maxillofacial surgeons are always careful about complications associated with the maxillary sinus. The aim of this study was to evaluate existing evidence that demonstrates the incidence of intentional sinus membrane perforation by dental implant in different depths, identify possible risk factors associated with membrane perforations, and describe the common complications as well as to assess the implant osseointegratin and the survival rate of implants placed in the posterior maxilla in a dog model. Material and Methods: A total of thirty two titanium implants were placed in the bilateral maxillary first molar areas of sixteen adult mongrel dogs, which were randomly divided into four groups according to the different penetrating depths of implants into the maxillary sinus cavities perforating the sinus membrane (group A: 0 mm; group B: 1 mm; group C: 2mm; group D: 3 mm). The sample, block biopsies were harvested six months after surgery and evaluated by radiographic observation and histological analysis. Results: After six months healing period, no signs of inflammatory reactions or complications were observed in any maxillary sinus of the sixteen doges. The tips of the implants with penetrating depth of 1 mm and 2 mm were found to be fully covered with newly formed healthy membrane and partially with new bone. The tips of the implants with penetrating depth over 3 mm were exposed in the sinus cavity and showed no membrane or bone coverage. In the present study ground sections of bone blocks showed a successful osseointegration between all implants and bony sinus floor, and the growing bone tissue was observed on the surfaces of the implant which indicated an ongoing process of bone regeneration. Conclusions: It can be conclude that posterior maxillary edentulous areas with reduced bone height may be successfully rehabilitated with implants that penetrate the Schneiderian membrane and extending into the maxillary antrum, , despite the different protrusion extent, penetration of dental implant into the maxillary sinus with membrane perforation does not compromise the dental implant osseointegration process and the sinus health during the 6-monthes observational period in canines.
Keyword: Maxillary sinus, Dental implants, Perforation, Complications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP3.106
Download: Request For Article
 
Clients

Clients

Clients

Clients

Clients
ONLINE SUBMISSION
USER LOGIN
Username
Password
Login | Register
News & Events
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
Refund Policy
Instrucations for Subscribers
Privacy Policy

Copyrights Form

0.12
2018CiteScore
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Google Scholar

hit counters free