IJPR  articles are Indexed in SCOPUSClick Here     Impact Factor for Five Years is 0.13 (2013 - 2018).    

logo

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

A Step Towards Excellence

IJPR included in UGC-Approved List of Journals - Ref. No. is SL. No. 4812 & J. No. 63703

ISSN
0975-2366
5 - Years Impact Factor

Year 2012 - 2016

Impact Factor: 1.55

Total Publications: 317

Total Citation: 491

Year 2011 - 2015

Impact Factor: 1.46

Total Publications: 326

Total Citation: 477

Year 2010 - 2014

Impact Factor: 1.3

Total Publications: 313

Total Citation: 407

Year 2009 - 2013

Impact Factor: 0.973

Total Publications: 293

Total Citation: 285

Current Issue
22nd NATIONAL CONVENTION

22nd National Convention of Society of Pharmacognosy & International Conference. For more details visit


For More Detail Visit ncsp.ganpatuniversity.ac.in
Article In Press
No Data found.
ADOBE READER

(Require Adobe Acrobat Reader to open, If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Index Page 1
Click here to Download
IJPRT ISSUE

January - March 6 [1] 2014

Click to download
IJPR 9[3] July - September 2017 Special Issue

July - September 9[3] 2017

Click to download
PIPPHARMACON & IJPR 2018

PIPPHARMACON & IJPR 2018

Click to download
 

Article Detail

Label
Label
Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion in supine and prone position

Author: FATEMEH ZADEGAN, SHARIF SHARIFI, FARZANEH ATTARI
Abstract: Induction and maintenance of anesthesia in prone position using a laryngeal mask airway is challenging and controversial. In this article, insertion of the laryngeal mask airway in supine and ISprone position is compared. Two groups of fifty patients referred to Salman Farsi Hospital in Boushehr aged 19-65 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists' classification of I or II who were undergoing elective surgery in the prone or supine position were assigned to an airway secured by a Classic LMA. The numbers of insertion attempts using the LMA were documented, along with displacement and laryngospasm In 96% of patients in prone group inserting the laryngeal mask was successful at the first time but in the supine group, it was 74 percent. The ease of inserting the mask was correlated with the patient's position. Laryngospasm did not occur in the supine group but occurred in 4% of prone patients. No statistically significant differences were observed Between Laryngospasm and patient's position.Insertion of the laryngeal mask airway in prone position is Safe and dependable. By inserting a laryngeal mask airway in prone position the risk of laryngospasm is not necessarily increased.
Keyword: Laryngeal Masks, Prone Position, Supine Position, Laryngismus.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2019.11.01.076
Download: Request For Article
 












ONLINE SUBMISSION
USER LOGIN


Username
Password
Login | Register
AICTE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE

AICTE Sponsored International Conference on Challenges, Opportunities and Newer Directions of Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Research in India

Download Brochure


For More Detail Visit www.pippharmacon.org
News & Events
Google Scholar

hit counters free
0.07
2017CiteScore
 
11th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Impact Factor for five years is 1.55 (2012 - 2016)

Year 2011 - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.46 Total Publications - 326 Total Citations - 477