IJPR  articles are Indexed in SCOPUS (2010 - 2021)Click Here     *Five Years Citation in Google scholar (2016 - 2020) is. 1451*        Now IJPR is Q2 in SJR Ranking     Scopus Coverage of IJPR (2010-2021 Issue 1)          Journal is Currently Not Indexed in Scopus as on february 2021 list provided by scopus

logo

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

A Step Towards Excellence
Published by : Advanced Scientific Research
ISSN
0975-2366
Current Issue
No Data found.
Article In Press
No Data found.
ADOBE READER

(Require Adobe Acrobat Reader to open, If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Index Page 1
Click here to Download
IJPR 9[3] July - September 2017 Special Issue

July - September 9[3] 2017

Click to download
 

Article Detail

Label
Label
Role of hexidine ,zak and biofresh mouth wash in commemoration deletion and oral health status. (comparative study)

Author: SALAH IBRAHIM, ALI SAHIB HUSSEIN
Abstract: Estimate the commemoration and calculus deletion during hexidine ,zak and biofresh mouth wash and To compare hexidine ,zak and biofresh mouth wash in daily use, mostly in relative to commemoration deletion and gingival health. Dye, calculus deletion . A randomize blinde precise provisional with 50 in fine fettle human agrees of stage group 18- 25 years was approved out. The topics were erratically dispensed to 3 groups i.e., group A –hexidine mouth rinse with and without dentifrice, Group B –zak mouth wash with and without dentifrice and group C–biofresh mouth wash with and without dentifrice. Commemoration accretion and gingival complaint were verified using commemoration. Ruel commemoration and gingival notches were condensed over the 3 week probationarydated for all groups by hexidine ,zak and biofresh mouth wash resulted in a cruel commemoration decline of hexidine mouth wash of 60% . biofresh mouth wash in a cruel commemoration decline of 50%. Zak mouth wash in a cruel commemoration decline of 45%.This decrease in commemoration to nearly 60 percent for hexidinewash{ P-ethics> 0.05}, 50 percent for biofresh wash{ P-ethics> 0.05} and Zak mouth wash in a cruel 45 percent decrease in commemoration{ P-ethics> 0.05}. Much important changes were observed between table A and table B. Since the effectiveness of the deletion of commemoration was emphasized more with hexidine mouth wash than with biofresh wash, the commemorative decrease was 45 percent{ P-ethics>0.05}. There have been important changes between Table A and Table C. Since the effectiveness of the deletion of commemoration was emphasized more with hexidine mouth wash than zak mouth wash. Hexidine mouth wash has more effect than biofreh and zak mouth wash in the removal of commemoration and calculus during hexidine, zak and biofresh mouth wash.
Keyword: hexidine, zak and biofresh mouth wash, gingivitis, oral hygiene, commemoration, index.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2019.11.01.045
Download: Request For Article
 




ONLINE SUBMISSION
USER LOGIN


Username
Password
Login | Register
News & Events
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
Refund Policy
Instrucations for Subscribers
Privacy Policy

Copyrights Form

0.12
2018CiteScore
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Google Scholar

hit counters free