*Five Years Citation in Google scholar (2016 - 2020) is. 1451*   *    IJPR IS INDEXED IN ELSEVIER EMBASE & EBSCO *       

logo

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

A Step Towards Excellence
Published by : Advanced Scientific Research
ISSN
0975-2366
Current Issue
Article In Press
No Data found.
ADOBE READER

(Require Adobe Acrobat Reader to open, If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Index Page 1
Click here to Download
IJPR 9[3] July - September 2017 Special Issue

July - September 9[3] 2017

Click to download
 

Article Detail

Label
Label
Laparoscopic and Open Burch Colposuspension For Stress Urinary Incontinence: Advantages / Disadvantages

Author: AHMED ALI OBAID, SHIREN ALI AL-HAMZAWI, AHMED ABDUL AMEER ALWAN
Abstract: Objectives: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) represents considerable physical and psychological load on women. Laparoscopic colposuspension (LC) for treatment of women with SUI is getting publicity because of its advantages such as, the small incisions, the short hospital stays and better esthetic results. This paper throws light on the advantages and disadvantages of (LC) and opens Burch colposuspension (OC) for urinary incontinence besides their related complications. Patients and Methods: Twenty six women with SUI from two hospitals who had physical, social and psychological sequel were enrolled for this study through 1st of December 2017 to10th of February 2019. The sample was equally divided into two groups each one of 13 women. Data were collected and analyzed statistically. P = 0.05 has statistical significance. Results: The study disclosed that the operative time in OC approach was significantly shorter than for LC approach (59.2 ± 5.3 minutes, 91 ± 4.5 minutes) respectively. The mean blood loss is higher in OC approach than the LC approach (152.2 ± 30.3, 143.3 ± 38.6) respectively. LC approach has minimum pain and short hospital stay than OC approach. Patients who had the LC approach required less analgesia postoperatively (8.9 ± 1.3 mg versus 2.5 ± 1.8 mg), less length of hospitalization (70.2 ± 8.9 hours versus 110.3 ± 11.4 hours). Resumption of normal activity was quicker in LC approaches than OC approaches (25.1± (12.6) days, 18.9± (12.5) days) respectively. Regarding the complications no significant difference was revealed between OC and LC approaches. Conclusions: LC is a superior and less invasive approach in comparison with open Burch approach concerning hospital stay, blood loss, pain and period of recovery, while the operation time is longer.
Keyword: Stress, Laparoscopy, analgesia, urinary
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2021.13.01.293
Download: Request For Article
 




ONLINE SUBMISSION
USER LOGIN


Username
Password
Login | Register
News & Events
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
Refund Policy
Instrucations for Subscribers
Privacy Policy

Copyrights Form

0.12
2018CiteScore
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Google Scholar

hit counters free