*Five Years Citation in Google scholar (2016 - 2020) is. 1451*   *    IJPR IS INDEXED IN ELSEVIER EMBASE & EBSCO *       

logo

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

A Step Towards Excellence
Published by : Advanced Scientific Research
ISSN
0975-2366
Current Issue
Article In Press
No Data found.
ADOBE READER

(Require Adobe Acrobat Reader to open, If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Index Page 1
Click here to Download
IJPR 9[3] July - September 2017 Special Issue

July - September 9[3] 2017

Click to download
 

Article Detail

Label
Label
Comparative evaluation of contact and contour in patients with Proximal Composite Restoration, using self-adhesive matrix and pre-contoured sectional matrix.

Author: AKSHAY JAISWAL, ANUJA IKHAR, Y.U. CHITRIV
Abstract: Background: Formation of anatomically optimum contact points with direct restorations still remains a challenge. Posterior restorations frequently exhibit various problems like improper contact, proximal overhangs, inadvertent contour. Improper condensation of the restorative material and polymerization shrinkage of restorative material may be responsible for these problems Self-adhesive matrix band system has been newly introduced to restore the Class II cavities. They are morphological shaped transparent matrices. Recontoured sectional matrix band system is relatively new and has shown to make an optimum anatomical contact point. The advantage been it creates a squeezing condition which leads to a superior contact with the adjacent teeth, creates superior outline of proximal side for restoration of proximal teeth on comparison with usual matrix system, allows easy placement of matrix, especially for fillings which implicate just 1 proximal surface. AIM: To compare contact and contour in Proximal Resin Composite Restorations clinically using self-adhesive matrix and pre-contoured sectional matrix, with bitewing radiograph and dental floss. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A total of 26 subjects with proximal caries will be selected and they will be separated into two parts, group A will be treated using self-adhesive matrix system and group B using pre-contoured sectional matrix and then the restorations will be evaluated for proximal contact and contour by bitewing radiograph and dental floss. RESULT: Both the matrix system will be showing good proximal contour and contact as compared to the conventional one used and pre-contoured matrix system will show better results as compared to self-adhesive system.
Keyword: proximal overhangs, matrix, self-adhesive matrix, pre-contoured sectional matrix
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2019.11.02.212
Download: Request For Article
 




ONLINE SUBMISSION
USER LOGIN
Username
Password
Login | Register
News & Events
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
Refund Policy
Instrucations for Subscribers
Privacy Policy

Copyrights Form

0.12
2018CiteScore
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Google Scholar

hit counters free