*Five Years Citation in Google scholar (2016 - 2020) is. 1451*   *    IJPR IS INDEXED IN ELSEVIER EMBASE & EBSCO *       

logo

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

A Step Towards Excellence
Published by : Advanced Scientific Research
ISSN
0975-2366
Current Issue
No Data found.
Article In Press
No Data found.
ADOBE READER

(Require Adobe Acrobat Reader to open, If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Index Page 1
Click here to Download
IJPR 9[3] July - September 2017 Special Issue

July - September 9[3] 2017

Click to download
 

Article Detail

Label
Label
Study of the Outcome of Bubble CPAP Ventilation in Neonates with Respiratory Distress

Author: DR. S., DR. J. M. PAWAR
Abstract: Use of the mechanical ventilation along with NICU could demand a high degree of competence and skilled professionals that is far from possible in most of our country's central as well as regional hospitals. In the lack of neonatal intensive care units, the value of B-CPAP increases the result of neonates diagnosed with B-CPAP before being moved to a tertiary programme. Bubble CPAP can also be used in low services as the main respiratory function. Bubble CPAP is an efficient way to boost oxygenation in pre-term, respiratory-distressed LBW babies (eg. PH, O2 and PCO2, PO2, BE, etc.). BCPAP use has been reported to reduce accidents, hospitalization and mechanical ventilation requirements. It has been found that neonates with Mechanical Ventilation for 18 (36 per cent) of BCPAP were 24-32 hours, whereas those with 12 (24 per cent) and 10 (20 per cent), were 32-72 hours or even > 72 hours, accordingly.
Keyword: Neonatal respiratory distress, mechanical ventilation, CPAP, Airway pressure
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2020.12.01.185
Download: Request For Article
 
Clients

Clients

Clients

Clients

Clients
ONLINE SUBMISSION
USER LOGIN
Username
Password
Login | Register
News & Events
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
Refund Policy
Instrucations for Subscribers
Privacy Policy

Copyrights Form

0.12
2018CiteScore
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Google Scholar

hit counters free