*Five Years Citation in Google scholar (2016 - 2020) is. 1451*   *    IJPR IS INDEXED IN ELSEVIER EMBASE & EBSCO *       

logo

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

A Step Towards Excellence
Published by : Advanced Scientific Research
ISSN
0975-2366
Current Issue
Article In Press
No Data found.
ADOBE READER

(Require Adobe Acrobat Reader to open, If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Index Page 1
Click here to Download
IJPR 9[3] July - September 2017 Special Issue

July - September 9[3] 2017

Click to download
 

Article Detail

Label
Label
Compared the effects of skeletal anchored maxillary protraction Vs dental anchored maxillary protraction in children with class iii malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author: ALIREZA CHAMANI, PARISA DOROUDGAR, KHANMIRZA BADRI
Abstract: Background and aim: The aim of this systematic review and Meta-analysis was compared the effects of skeletal anchored maxillary protraction vs dental anchored maxillary protraction in children class III malocclusion. Method: MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ISI, google scholar were used as electronic databases to perform a systematic literature between 2010 to April 2020. Endnote x8 software used for electronic title management. The present systematic review was performed based on the main consideration of PRISMA Statement–Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis and by the PICO strategy. Result: A total of 218 potentially relevant titles and abstracts were found during the electronic and manual search. Finally, a total of five publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria required for this systematic review. Mean difference in SNB was (MD, 2.29(°) 95% CI 1.84(°)-2.74(°). P= 0.00) and heterogeneity found (I2 = 99.87%; P =0.00). Mean difference in ANB was (MD, 1.56(°) 95% CI 1.05(°)-2.07(°). P= 0.00) and heterogeneity found (I2 = 92.64%; P =0.00) Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed in comparison between SAMP versus DAMP treatment, SAMP in maxillary protraction were more prominent compared to DAMP.
Keyword: skeletal anchored maxillary protraction, dental anchored maxillary protraction, Malocclusion, Angle Class III
Download: Request For Article
 




ONLINE SUBMISSION
USER LOGIN


Username
Password
Login | Register
News & Events
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
Refund Policy
Instrucations for Subscribers
Privacy Policy

Copyrights Form

0.12
2018CiteScore
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Google Scholar

hit counters free