IJPR  articles are Indexed in SCOPUSClick Here     Impact Factor for Five Years is 0.13 (2013 - 2018).    

logo

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

A Step Towards Excellence

IJPR included in UGC-Approved List of Journals - Ref. No. is SL. No. 4812 & J. No. 63703

Published by : Advanced Scientific Research
ISSN
0975-2366
Current Issue
Article In Press
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Occupation Induced Asthma among Traffic Police in Bangalore City
o Estimate the Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress among Adolescents in Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu
A Study on Risk Factors of Anaemia among Pregnant Women
n Approach of Nutritional Deficiency Disorder among Pregnant Women
The Determinants of Self Care Practices By Using DSME to Facilitate the Patients In Kanchipuram District
An evaluation of Epidemiological Factors Relating to Overweight, Obesity in Urban Chennai
A study on the Pattern of Body Image Perception among Adolescents in Urban Chennai
mpact of an External and Internal factors of overweight and obesity in urban
A study on Anti-Rabies Vaccine among Dog Bite Victims in chennai region
Hospital Based Cross Sectional Study: Distribution of Compliance for completion of ARV 4 dose among study participants
12345678910...
ADOBE READER

(Require Adobe Acrobat Reader to open, If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Index Page 1
Click here to Download
IJPR 9[3] July - September 2017 Special Issue

July - September 9[3] 2017

Click to download
 

Article Detail

Label
Label
Compare Cement- And Screw-Retained Retention Systems in Fixed Implant-Supported Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author: SARA KHALEGHI, MARYAM FIROUZMANDI , AZADEH KIANIPOUR, AZADE FARHANGNIA
Abstract: Background and aim: Fixed-implant prostheses in the edentulous jaw are also a scientifically justified treatment option. Two fixation methods are used for fixed implant-supported restorations. They can be attached to implants with screws, or they can be cemented to abutments which are attached to implants. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the best type of retention system in fixed implant-supported restorations. Method: MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ISI, google scholar were used as electronic databases to perform a systematic literature between 2010 to 2019. A commercially available software program (Endnote X9) was used for electronic title management. Searches were performed with keywords, “screw-retained”, “Cement-retained”,” retention systems”,” ixed implant-supported”, “restoration” “implant” , ““cement”, “dental implant”. The present systematic review was performed based on the main consideration of PRISMA Statement– Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. Result: A total of 63 potentially relevant titles and abstracts were found during the electronic and manual search. Finally, a total of six publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria required for this systematic review. For survival rates of implants heterogeneity found (I2 = 0.0%. p = 1.000), the meta-analysis showed a risk ratio of 0.993 (95% CI: 0.890– 1.109). in comparison of studies evaluating survival rates of Prostheses, heterogeneity found (I2 = 0.0%. p = 1.000), The meta-analysis showed a risk ratio of 0.991 (95% CI: 0.865– 1.136). Conclusion: Marginal bone loss in cement retained less than screw-retained.
Keyword: cement- retained, screw-retained, retention systems, fixed implant-supported restorations
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2020.12.01.122
Download: Request For Article
 












ONLINE SUBMISSION
USER LOGIN


Username
Password
Login | Register
News & Events
0.12
2018CiteScore
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Google Scholar

hit counters free
0.07
2017CiteScore
 
11th percentile
Powered by  Scopus